<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucene 2.4.1 available from today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marcsturlese.com/2009/03/09/lucene-241-available-from-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marcsturlese.com/2009/03/09/lucene-241-available-from-today/</link>
	<description>Life, code and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 13:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Sturlese</title>
		<link>http://www.marcsturlese.com/2009/03/09/lucene-241-available-from-today/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Sturlese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 22:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcsturlese.com/?p=76#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Hey Rajani,
I supose you are working with Solr and not directly with Lucene. For a correct usage of Solr sharding I would recomend you keep the same schema for all the shards. 
There isn&#039;t a way to merge fields from different documents in a single doc on the Solr distributed search merging process.
I think you should consider reorganizing the data in your index. Shards are meant to scale data horizontally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rajani,<br />
I supose you are working with Solr and not directly with Lucene. For a correct usage of Solr sharding I would recomend you keep the same schema for all the shards.<br />
There isn&#8217;t a way to merge fields from different documents in a single doc on the Solr distributed search merging process.<br />
I think you should consider reorganizing the data in your index. Shards are meant to scale data horizontally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajani</title>
		<link>http://www.marcsturlese.com/2009/03/09/lucene-241-available-from-today/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 07:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marcsturlese.com/?p=76#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Hello Marc..
 I want know a way where i can merge attributes across cores into single DOC not just merging cores; it will not merge attributes in same single doc..

I split my data in different cores wid different schemas in hierarchy..
Now i want to perform search across all cores that i am doing using Shards concepts..
But i have a problem that is regarding Logical operator..
I cannot perform AND operation across cores..
The result will fail..(as data in cores different)
Is there any way of dynamic merging of attributes..So that i can fix this logical operator problem..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Marc..<br />
 I want know a way where i can merge attributes across cores into single DOC not just merging cores; it will not merge attributes in same single doc..</p>
<p>I split my data in different cores wid different schemas in hierarchy..<br />
Now i want to perform search across all cores that i am doing using Shards concepts..<br />
But i have a problem that is regarding Logical operator..<br />
I cannot perform AND operation across cores..<br />
The result will fail..(as data in cores different)<br />
Is there any way of dynamic merging of attributes..So that i can fix this logical operator problem..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

